By clicking “Accept All Cookies”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Privacy Policy for more information.
Request a demo

Fill out the form below, and our team will contact you within 24 hours to arrange a personalized demonstration.

Thank you!

Your request has been received. Our team will contact you within 24 hours to schedule your personalized demo.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Technical

KVI strategy 2025: what has changed in the approach to key products

Retail has returned to a timeless truth: shoppers judge an entire chain through a small set of remembered prices. What’s different in 2025 is which prices they remember—and how strongly “felt inflation” can diverge from measured inflation. That divergence is forcing a shift from static KVI lists to a continuously managed portfolio of price-image anchors.

2024-12-07
6 minutes

Retail has returned to a timeless truth: shoppers judge an entire chain through a small set of remembered prices. What’s different in 2025 is which prices they remember—and how strongly “felt inflation” can diverge from measured inflation. That divergence is forcing a shift from static KVI lists to a continuously managed portfolio of price-image anchors.

Executive takeaways

  • Perceived inflation remains elevated even as headline inflation moderates, and it is shaped disproportionately by frequently purchased, highly visible items.
  • Trade-down persists, but so does selective splurging—making “value” and “treat” missions coexist in the same household.
  • Private label is now a mainstream value benchmark, increasingly used to anchor entry price points and ladders—rather than a side strategy.
  • Measurement is moving toward “effective price” (promotions, loyalty discounts) as evidenced by national statistics offices adopting scanner/till data at scale.
  • Unit price governance matters more as shrinkflation and pack changes can erode trust even when shelf price looks stable.

The new data: why “price perception” became a first-order strategy variable

The gap between sentiment and reality is persistent. A Federal Reserve note comparing sentiment to verified retail purchases shows that what households feel is not always what their receipts confirm—yet sentiment still drives behavior. (Federal Reserve)

Inflation expectations stay higher than current inflation across many economies. A global survey synthesized in the Bank for International Settlements Quarterly Review finds household inflation expectations elevated above prevailing inflation and professional forecasts, underscoring why price anxiety can linger. (Bank for International Settlements)

Food and everyday items carry outsized weight in expectations. The UN DESA briefing notes that household expectations are especially responsive to food inflation versus other components—precisely where KVIs often sit. (Economic Analysis and Policy Division)

Even with moderation, “inflation is still felt” where it counts. In the U.S., the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reports CPI +2.7% (Dec-to-Dec 2025) and food +3.1%, keeping everyday budgets under pressure.

What changed in KVI selection in 2025

Shift A — From one annual list to mission-based KVI portfolios

Leading retailers are moving from “Top-200 KVIs” to separate KVI sets by:

• shopping mission (top-up, weekly stock-up, fresh meal, baby, health)

• channel (store, e-commerce, rapid delivery)

• micro-market competitor set (who shoppers truly compare locally)

Why: perception is shaped by salience, not by category share alone.

Shift B — From shelf price to effective price as the governed object

The Office for National Statistics is introducing groceries scanner data into inflation statistics (tracking prices across the month and capturing promotions/loyalty effects). That is a signal of where best practice is going: manage what customers actually pay, not only the list price. (Office for National Statistics)

Shift C — From branded KVIs to entry price points + private-label ladders

NielsenIQ highlights a structural rise in private-label relevance and increasingly tiered store-brand strategies. Meanwhile, McKinsey & Company shows trade-down remains widespread and private label is a meaningful share of that shift.

Shift D — From SKU price to unit price and pack integrity

The U.S. Government Accountability Office explains shrinkflation’s mechanism: pack size down without a proportional price drop lifts unit price and can amplify “unfairness” perceptions. Even if the macro impact is small, the trust impact can be large on high-salience staples.

Shift E — From intuition to test-and-learn and fast refresh

With behavior volatile, retailers increasingly refresh KVIs monthly/quarterly (with weekly monitoring), not annually—because the “remembered prices” set changes fast with promotions, pack changes, and competitor moves.

Shift F — From “KVI investment” to KVI economics (investment + funding)

Strong operators design KVI lists together with background items—products with low salience where margin can be protected without breaking trust (and where transparency on unit price still matters).

Blueprint: KVI 2025 operating model (six steps)

1. Define the objective as “price image outcomes,” not a single index. Link to trip frequency, switching, basket penetration for value missions, and margin after funding.

2. Build the candidate universe from salience—then validate with baskets.

Use frequency, visibility (promo, endcaps, searchability), and comparability (easy cross-store benchmark) to shortlist.

3. Score items with a Perception Impact Index.

Combine: (a) trip-driver correlation, (b) competitive sensitivity, (c) mission relevance, (d) complaint/attention signals, (e) unit price volatility risk.

4. Segment into tiers with different guardrails.

o KVI Core (anchors): strict gap rules vs key competitors

o KVI Support: drift protection triggers

o Background: margin optimization with fairness rules (unit price transparency, pack changes)

5. Govern effective price (base + promo + loyalty). The ONS shift to scanner data illustrates why this is becoming the standard reference. (Office for National Statistics)

6. Refresh continuously with clear triggers. Triggers: competitor shock, pack resize, promo war, PL ladder move, online price visibility spike.

What to track weekly: the “KVI cockpit”

• Effective price gaps vs local competitor set (for Core + Support)

• Unit price gaps for reference packs (where pack churn exists)

• KVI availability/on-shelf (out-of-stock on anchors damages image fast)

• Private-label ladder integrity (good/better/best spacing)

• Investment vs funding (net margin impact after KVI defense)

• A lightweight “perception pulse” (short survey/panel or digital feedback)

One external benchmark worth noting: dunnhumby finds that “saving customers money” accounts for 41% of long-term success in its U.S. grocery rankings—reinforcing how central value perception remains.

KVI strategy in 2025 is “back to basics” with modern discipline: manage a small number of anchors relentlessly—but do it as a dynamic portfolio, governed on effective price and unit price, funded transparently, and refreshed at the speed the shopper’s memory updates.

Sign up for emails on new Organization articles

Never miss an insight. We'll email you when new articles are published on this topic.

Thank you! You have successfully subscribed to our newsletter.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Bring your toughest pricing questions?

Our experts will help you find the best solution for your needs.

Request a demo